Archive for July, 2012

July 25, 2012

What’s The Big Idea?: Hafez Modirzadeh

Many jazz albums are just collections of tunes, and that’s fine. But others are more conceptually unified than that—they may represent the exploration of a musician’s compositional theories, attempts to fuse music from diverse cultures, or something more. In our new feature, What’s the Big Idea?, we’ll periodically ask a musician to provide some background or context for an album we think needs it.

First up is saxophonist Hafez Modirzadeh. His latest album, Post-Chromodal Out!, is described as follows by his label, Pi Recordings:

“It is the culmination of a system he calls ‘chromodality,’ which Modirzadeh originally developed to integrate Persian tones with Western equal temperament to further explore harmonic possibilities in jazz. He has since expanded his concept to encompass a ‘post-chromodal’ approach in which all kinds of intervals co-exist; one with meta-cultural potential that allows each musician to use his own distinctive voice to explore music from a full palette of tonal possibilities.”

Yeah, but what does that mean to someone who can’t read music, doesn’t play an instrument, and just listens to music for pure aesthetic pleasure? We sent Modirzadeh four questions about his music and his album, which he was kind enough to answer.

What does “post-chromodal” mean, in terms of how the music will actually sound to someone walking in off the street, so to speak?
To the unfamiliar ear, post-chromodal music will sound “out-of-tune” at first, regardless of what instruments are being played. This is because tones beyond those found on a piano or guitar are being used together to shape melodies that do not follow any one style. Since several different styles could be played at once, the word refers to what comes after we are done describing and combining different musical styles or systems.

Did you write this music specifically for the players who appear on the album, and if so, in what ways does it cater to their particular skills/talents?
Yes, this is music to be conceived with specific players in mind,  brought together here for their own original contributions on their instruments: Royal Hartigan is able to adapt numerous drumming traditions to the drumset, going beyond jazz; likewise, Ken Filiano‘s extended bass techniques carry a deeply personal expression; Amir ElSaffar makes trumpet history with his ability to integrate tones from Iraqi modes on his instrument; Vijay Iyer‘s own virtuosic approach to piano enables him to absorb new concepts in a completely innovative way; guests Tim Volpicella on re-tuned guitar, Danongan Kalanduyan on Filipino kulintang, and Faraz Minooei on Persian santur demonstrate how others’ tunings can co-exist with ours in newly harmonious ways.

If you played one of these songs back to back with a more traditionally structured (whether that’s in terms of melody, harmony, or something else, which you could feel free to explain) jazz song, how noticeable would the differences be to a neophyte listener?
At first, not that noticeable, especially if the “jazz song” you are referring to is in a modern jazz style after about 1960. The melody form is being driven in a loose way by a standard jazz quintet instrumentation; some melodies may have a Persian style of phrasing that goes beyond standard jazz feel. Then, one hears a tuning that is not standard in any sense of the term—couldn’t be identified by any traditional style anywhere—particularly when heard by the piano. The listener will have to deal with this different sound in their own personal way.

How do you utilize your background and musical knowledge when composing—do you start writing a jazz piece and then “Persian it up,” for lack of a better phrase, or start writing from a Persian point of view and then “jazz it up,” or is there something else going on?
I have developed a way of composing that doesn’t draw exclusively from any particular musical system, although my primary inspiration comes from the jazz model. Many years ago, I would seek to adapt Persian musical phrasing to jazz tunes—as I was born in Durham, North Carolina, with living experiences from all over the world, I cannot claim to have any sort of “Persian point of view” to music—anything musically Iranian came through my personal studies with Mahmoud Zoufonoun. Later, as a player, I found deep structures shared among several musical idioms of the world, from Africa to Asia, and worked all this into my own way of conveying a story, or message about cherishing relationships wherever we can find them.

Buy Post-Chromodal Out! from Amazon

July 23, 2012

Peter Crawley

by Izalia Roncallo

A white piece of heavy paper, covered with over a thousand pinholes, is the start of a dialogue between artist and material. This process is more than just the action, it is also a negotiation with the material. The artist is captivated by the changeability that each gesture holds, and the longer the materials are dealt with, the easier it becomes to deal with certain discomforts. For instance, the pain caused by the needle when pushing through a new hole, or the way the thimble rubs against the skin of the finger, or even the tugging of the thread that quickly becomes ritualistic, slowly easing to a fluid motion. Why chose such a labor-intensive venture? For the glory of saying “I made this,” and also to see the visual representation of this dialogue that is taking place. Even though the process is part of any artwork, it is a theme emphasized more strongly by those artists working in craft-based forms. Just look at an issue of American Craft magazine, and you will see it mentioned in basically every article.

After observing the stitched Illustrations of Peter Crawley in magazines and on blogs, countless writers have focused on the time-consuming aspect of the pieces. In case you haven’t seen his work, Crawley creates images on different stocks of art paper, pierces the pattern by hand, and finally stitches the paper with cotton thread. The motifs vary from architectural to typographical to geometric patterns. The style of the images is crisp and controlled, possibly an inclination arising from his career as a product designer. The stitching itself is nostalgic, and for some a whole sensory experience, as one remembers a long summer afternoon sitting around with grandma, learning the different types of stitches, as a faint smell of basil came from her hands and the barely-there pink of her nail polish constantly moved with each gesture she made. Nevertheless, within the realm of stitching Crawley’s work is in a class of its own, especially when one looks at his architectural and audiovisual depictions.

So why would a critic focus on the particulars of how long a work takes as the main characteristic when evaluating a piece of art? Process doesn’t necessarily mean the time spent from beginning to end on a project; it can actually relate to the way the materials are handled, as well. Ann Hamilton is an example to this aspect of process. In her work, she emphasizes the process of transforming natural materials like cotton into sculptural installations. But process could, and should, also include the period when ideas are being worked out in the mind of the artists. For some, it is when the artist comes up with the first concept that eventually turns into a style that is instantly recognizable by the world. Just look at the oeuvre of Eva Hesse, in which she explored the problems associated with process and change through serial repetitions. Others might say it is all these descriptions combined that are essential to any art process.

Peter Crawley’s first stitched illustration was inspired by a trip across America. The depiction was a map of the United States, hand-stitched, with red showing his route from coast to coast. It is neither complex nor intricate at all; it is a basic illustration, but that stitched image has inspired many other ideas after the original process of its creation. It’s a puzzle: Why did stitching come to his mind? What about the United States made him think to create such a representation? Did something he saw on his trip make him think, this is something I want to attempt?

When so many other questions can be asked of his work, why is so much emphasis laid on how long it takes him to finish a given illustration? For instance, why has Crawley chosen to work in a craft—stitching—that is more commonly associated with female artists? Concentrating on Crawley’s audio-visual themed work, more questions arise. When he stitches patterns based on sonic waveforms, what kind of technology is he using to acquire these images? Given that these images only depict a single minute of a song, how does Crawley determine which section of a piece of music to concentrate on? As one can see, countless concessions and negotiations with oneself are made in the art-making process, because art is not random, and is part of gaining knowledge and understanding of a bigger system.

July 11, 2012

Andrew Hill’s Last Concert

Andrew Hill‘s final live performance was a trio set, backed by bassist John Hébert and drummer Eric McPherson, at Trinity Church in New York on March 29, 2007. He passed away three weeks later, on April 20. The performance is preserved online in two parts. (For some reason, they’re mis-labeled; Part 1 is labeled Part 2, and vice versa. They’re in the correct order below.)

Part 1:

Part 2:

July 9, 2012

Moebius + Tietchens, “Cremon”

Here’s something to brighten up your morning: “Cremon” is the first track from the self-titled debut album by Moebius + Tietchens—yes, a duo project featuring Dieter Moebius (of Cluster/Kluster and Harmonia) and solo artist Asmus Tietchens. The two first worked together in 1976, as part of the group Liliental, which also included legendary producer Conny Plank as well as Okko Becker and Helmut Hattler. This is their first collaboration since then.

Check it out:

The album is available now from Amazon.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 49 other followers

%d bloggers like this: